Spend five minutes in any audio forum and you'll see people getting into heated arguments about file formats. FLAC purists saying anything less is an affront. MP3 fans saying the difference isn't real. AAC people quietly using their iPhones. So who's right? Honestly? All of them, depending on what you're actually trying to do.
Let me give you the practical, non-tribal answer.
The Short Version (If You Just Want an Answer)
- Use MP3 if you want your files to play on any device, anywhere, forever. 192kbps minimum, 256kbps if you want to be safe.
- Use AAC if you're deep in the Apple ecosystem (iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple Music). Better quality per file size than MP3.
- Use FLAC if you're archiving music you care about, or if you have actually good headphones and a quiet listening environment.
- WAV is for audio professionals doing editing work. Not really a "listening" format for most people.
That's it. The rest of this is explaining why, if you want to understand what's actually going on under the hood.
The Two Camps: Lossy vs Lossless
Before comparing specific formats, you have to understand this distinction because it explains everything:
Lossy formats (MP3, AAC, OGG) throw away audio data you probably can't hear anyway. They sound nearly identical to the original at decent bitrates, but the process is irreversible. You can't get back what was removed.
Lossless formats (FLAC, WAV, ALAC) keep everything. Zero quality loss. The trade-off is file size. A 4-minute song that's 7MB as a 256kbps MP3 might be 30MB as FLAC.
Here's the uncomfortable truth audiophiles don't love: a properly conducted blind test at 192kbps MP3 vs FLAC will fool most people most of the time. The human ear at normal listening conditions, through normal headphones, in a typical room — can't reliably tell the difference. Studies back this up.
That doesn't mean the difference is zero. It means the difference is smaller than people think, and the context matters a lot.
MP3: Why It's Still the King
MP3 is 33 years old. By tech standards that's ancient. And yet it's still everywhere, still the default assumption when someone says "audio file."
The reason is simple: MP3 plays on literally everything. A Bluetooth speaker from 2009. An old car stereo. A cheap gym MP3 player. A smart TV. A phone from any era. Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android. No exceptions, no asterisks.
AAC is better on paper. Opus is even better technically. But "technically better" doesn't matter if the device in your car doesn't support it.
At 192kbps, MP3 quality is genuinely excellent for casual listening. At 256kbps it's borderline indistinguishable from lossless for 95% of listeners on 95% of equipment. The patent on MP3 expired in 2017, so it's free to use forever.
Recommendation: If you're converting video to audio for general use, 192kbps MP3 is the right call. Bump to 256 or 320 if you have the storage and want max quality.
AAC: Better Quality, Less Drama
AAC is what YouTube uses internally. What Apple Music streams. What most MP4 video files use for their audio track. It's the successor to MP3, designed to be about 30% more efficient.
In practice that means: a 128kbps AAC file sounds roughly as good as a 160-192kbps MP3. Same perceived quality, smaller file. If you're on an iPhone and using Apple's ecosystem exclusively, there's no real reason to use MP3 over AAC.
The compatibility catch: older hardware (pre-2012 car stereos, ancient MP3 players, dedicated audio devices) sometimes won't play AAC. If you're sending audio to someone and don't know what they'll use to play it, MP3 is safer.
FLAC: When Quality Actually Matters
FLAC is lossless, open-source, and supported widely on modern devices. The file is bigger but the audio is mathematically identical to the original. You can convert FLAC to any lossy format later without extra generational loss. You can't go the other direction.
Here's when FLAC actually makes sense:
- You're archiving your music collection. Store in FLAC, convert to MP3 or AAC as needed for different devices. The FLAC is your master copy.
- You're recording audio. Record in a lossless format, then encode to distribution format when done. Don't bake in compression artifacts during recording.
- You have a good DAC, good headphones, and a quiet room. Sennheiser HD 800, Audeze LCD series, dedicated hi-fi equipment — at this level, yes, FLAC vs 320kbps MP3 can be audibly different on certain tracks.
- You're particular about this stuff. If it bothers you to know data has been thrown away, just use FLAC. Peace of mind has value.
On an iPhone with earbuds on the subway? You are not hearing the difference. That's not an insult, it's just physics. The ambient noise floor alone makes subtle audio quality differences inaudible.
The Actual Numbers
| Format | Type | File Size (4 min song) | Compatibility | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP3 192kbps | Lossy | ~5.5 MB | Universal | General use |
| MP3 320kbps | Lossy | ~9.5 MB | Universal | High quality listening |
| AAC 192kbps | Lossy | ~5.5 MB | Very good | Apple ecosystem |
| FLAC | Lossless | ~25-30 MB | Good (modern) | Archiving, audiophile |
| WAV | Lossless (uncompressed) | ~40 MB | Universal | Audio editing only |
The Conversion Question
People often ask: if I convert my FLAC files to MP3, do I lose quality? Yes, but not as much as you'd think if you use a decent bitrate. At 256kbps the loss is minimal for almost all listeners.
The thing you should absolutely never do is convert lossy to lossy. Taking an MP3 and converting it to AAC doesn't improve it. You're just adding a second round of compression artifacts on top of the first. If you have to convert, go from the highest quality source you have.
And if you're extracting audio from a video using something like the GetMP3.video converter, the output quality is limited by the video's audio quality anyway. Choosing 320kbps for a video that was only mastered at 128kbps won't give you better audio. It'll just make a bigger file.
So What Should You Pick?
For most people converting videos to audio: MP3 at 192kbps. It works everywhere, sounds excellent, and the files are a reasonable size. That's the boring correct answer and I stand by it.
If you know you'll only ever use Apple devices: AAC at 192kbps is slightly better technically.
If you're building a music archive and care about this stuff: FLAC, full stop. Store lossless, convert as needed.
The format war is mostly theoretical for normal listening conditions. Pick based on compatibility and storage, not based on forum opinion wars.
Convert Your Videos to MP3
Choose your quality setting (128, 192, or 320kbps) and convert any video to MP3. Free, browser-based, private.
Start Converting